I was fascinated by
this recent post on Heartbook and what with the troubles of the poor Social Network, I thought we might discuss it over here.
Honored Miss Sommerfeld Quotes the site
TVTripe TVTrope as saying:
Quote:
The "Aristasia" concept (Google is your friend) is a (relatively benign) combination of this, Daydream Believer (with regards to a Le Guin-esque SFF mythos), and an isolationist rendering of Born In The Wrong Century. Girls involved with this are sometimes associated with S&M, which they don’t much like.
I am not sure what an SFF mythos is (though I am pretty sure it isn't a mythos) but I looked up "Daydream Believer" on the same site. It gave some food for thought:
Quote:
Particle physicists have written much on the possibilities of multiple universes. Every single subatomic possibility spawns its own unique universe, each of which in turn spawns new universes from each of its own subatomic possibilities, creating the vast web of The Multiverse.
Thus, reason some people, somewhere out there in that vast sea lie universes wherein the events of their favorite TV shows, video games, and other media properties actually happened. While scientists are finding more and more evidence for parallel universes, possibly with different physics, it should be noted that even slightly altering physics is more likely to result in Earth (or even the entire cosmos) as we know it not forming at all rather than giving us a universe just like our own, only with superheroes or black mages.
So that is what we are? Hmm.
Actually, these material theories aren't at all the basis of our belief in the Motherlands - and other dimensions of reality, though they might throw a rather crude and obtuse light on things - rather the way neurology might throw a certain minor light on music while remaining ignorant that it was dealing ultimately with the Music of the Spheres and thereby missing 90% of the point.
But even if one takes the view (so implicit that the writer does not even imagine that it could be questioned) that universes are mere "accidents" and intelligent life has no central place in the structure of any cosmos, the argument that worlds in any way like ours are improbable is forgetting much of the theory.
Remember Schroedinger's cat? Since at the sub-atomic level the cat must be alive and dead at once, it is postulated that there is in fact an existential split in which there is one universe with a live cat and one with a dead cat.
Since such splits are constantly taking place there must be countless dimensional worlds very much like Telluria - as well as many more very much unlike it.
Whether we believe the theory or not we ought to get it right!